Evaluating Nanoparticles in Preclinical Research Using Microfluidic Systems
Zhu D., Long Q., Xu Y., Xing J.
Narrative Review on Hip, published in Micromachines (Basel) (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Micromachines (Basel) (2019)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 31234335
- PMCID
- PMC6631852
- DOI
- 10.3390/mi10060414
- Citations
- 23
Abstract (original English)
Nanoparticles (NPs) have found a wide range of applications in clinical therapeutic and diagnostic fields. However, currently most NPs are still in the preclinical evaluation phase with few approved for clinical use. Microfluidic systems can simulate dynamic fluid flows, chemical gradients, partitioning of multi-organs as well as local microenvironment controls, offering an efficient and cost-effective opportunity to fast screen NPs in physiologically relevant conditions. Here, in this review, we are focusing on summarizing key microfluidic platforms promising to mimic in vivo situations and test the performance of fabricated nanoparticles. Firstly, we summarize the key evaluation parameters of NPs which can affect their delivery efficacy, followed by highlighting the importance of microfluidic-based NP evaluation. Next, we will summarize main microfluidic systems effective in evaluating NP haemocompatibility, transport, uptake and toxicity, targeted accumulation and general efficacy respectively, and discuss the future directions for NP evaluation in microfluidic systems. The combination of nanoparticles and microfluidic technologies could greatly facilitate the development of drug delivery strategies and provide novel treatments and diagnostic techniques for clinically challenging diseases.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Tissue Eng Regen Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Tissue Eng Regen Med - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Comparative efficacy of different doses of mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissue sources for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 602 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in PeerJ (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 602
PeerJ - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Promoting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Animal Studies.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in J Diabetes Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Diabetes Res - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The Role of Exosome-miRNA as Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Case-Control and Longitudinal Studies
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 3046 on Neuroinflammation, published in Actas Esp Psiquiatr (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3046
Actas Esp Psiquiatr - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Exosome-based therapy for epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Neurosci - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol