Evaluation of the effects of adding an adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction to platelet-rich plasma injection in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: A randomized clinical trial.
Behrangi E., Rahimi ST., Zare S., Goodarzi A., Ghassemi M., Khodadad F.
Clinical Trial on Hair Loss, published in Skin Res Technol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Skin Res Technol (2024)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 38634195
- PMCID
- PMC11024502
- DOI
- 10.1111/srt.13700
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
Background Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells derived from adipose tissue and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are among novel treatments for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). We aimed to investigate the effect of adding SVF to PRP and compare it to administering PRP injection alone. Methods Eighteen patients were randomly divided into two groups of nine. The PRP group was treated with PRP at all three visits at 1-month intervals, while the SVF-PRP group received an SVF injection on the first visit and a PRP injection on the second and third visits. Each group was evaluated at baseline and 20 weeks after the therapy's initiation. Results Changes in mean hair diameter and hair count compared to baseline were significant in both groups. The PRP group experienced a greater increase in mean hair count than the SVF-PRP group, and the SVF-PRP group had a marginally greater increase in hair diameter than the PRP group. These differences were not statistically significant compared to each other. The patient and physician assessment scores exceeded the mean (on a scale from 0: poor to 3: excellent) in both groups. Conclusion Adding one SVF injection to two PRP treatment sessions versus three PRP injections alone had no significant difference in evaluated variables. If additional research demonstrates the same results, we suggest that multiple SVF injection sessions may be required to produce a
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The suitability of mesenchymal stem cells for treating immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 609 on Hair Loss, Immune Modulation, Autoimmune Research, published in Dermatol Reports (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 609
Dermatol Reports - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A systematic review of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of conditioned media, platelet-rich fibrin, stromal vascular fraction, extracellular vesicles, and stem cells in androgenetic alopecia.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 724 on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 724
Stem Cell Res Ther - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
DKK3-CKAP4 signaling drives fibroimmune remodeling and hair follicle miniaturization in androgenetic alopecia
Meta-analysis on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Theranostics (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Theranostics - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 24 on Chronic Wound, Burns, Hair Loss, published in J Int Med Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 24
J Int Med Res1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived exosomes in hair regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in World J Stem Cells (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
World J Stem Cells2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Exosomes and Hair Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence Across Alopecia Types and Exosome Sources.
Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol6 citations