The Evaluation of Ovarian Function Recovery Following Treatment of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is gaining awareness as its prevalence increases and its effect on patients is extremely negative. To date, several therapies have been designed to treat POI, but the conclusions are conflicting, in part, due to inconsistent evaluation methods. Thus, we explore a multi-index of ovarian function assessment methods to evaluate the recovery of ovarian function after various therapies in order to evaluate effectiveness in a more comprehensive manner. Aim The purpose of this review is to assess the effectiveness of various therapies to recover ovarian function in patients with POI. The primary outcome measures were anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, and antral follicle count (AFC). The secondary outcomes included the change of mean ovarian volume, menstruation recovery, and pregnancy rate. Methods Our systematic searching including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted to find all human clinical trial articles published from January 2000 to April 2021 and related to POI treatment, including the keywords: POI, AFC, and hormones. All prospective and retrospective studies exploring ovarian function recovery that include AFC, AMH levels, and FSH levels evolution throughout treatment were included. All patients included in the studies met the POI criteria described b

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.