Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Evolution of autologous chondrocyte repair and comparison to other cartilage repair techniques

Dewan AK., Gibson MA., Elisseeff JH., Trice ME.

Clinical Trial on Cartilage Damage, Chronic Wound, published in Biomed Res Int (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Biomed Res Int (2014)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
25210707
PMCID
PMC4151850
DOI
10.1155/2014/272481
Citations
83

Abstract (original English)

Unlabelled Articular cartilage defects have been addressed using microfracture, abrasion chondroplasty, or osteochondral grafting, but these strategies do not generate tissue that adequately recapitulates native cartilage. During the past 25 years, promising new strategies using assorted scaffolds and cell sources to induce chondrocyte expansion have emerged. We reviewed the evolution of autologous chondrocyte implantation and compared it to other cartilage repair techniques. Methods We searched PubMed from 1949 to 2014 for the keywords "autologous chondrocyte implantation" (ACI) and "cartilage repair" in clinical trials, meta-analyses, and review articles. We analyzed these articles, their bibliographies, our experience, and cartilage regeneration textbooks. Results Microfracture, abrasion chondroplasty, osteochondral grafting, ACI, and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis are distinguishable by cell source (including chondrocytes and stem cells) and associated scaffolds (natural or synthetic, hydrogels or membranes). ACI seems to be as good as, if not better than, microfracture for repairing large chondral defects in a young patient's knee as evaluated by multiple clinical indices and the quality of regenerated tissue. Conclusion Although there is not enough evidence to determine the best repair technique, ACI is the most established cell-based treatment for full-thicknes

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Cartilage, ArticularChondrocytesHumansTransplantation, AutologousRegenerationWound HealingChondrogenesisTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research