Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Extracellular matrix deposition by adipose-derived stem cells and fibroblasts: a comparative study.

Paganelli A., Benassi L., Rossi E., Magnoni C.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Arch Dermatol Res (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Arch Dermatol Res (2019)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31616972
DOI
10.1007/s00403-019-01997-8
Citations
30

Abstract (original English)

Cell-based strategies are today widely studied as possible therapies for wound healing. In this setting, fibroblasts play a key role since they are the main dermal cellular component and are responsible for extracellular matrix secretion. Several works report on the possibility of using fibroblast-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for wound healing in skin injuries. While fibroblast-based substitutes have already been intensively studied by other groups, we focused our attention on the possibility of creating an adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC)-induced dermal scaffold for wound healing. ADSCs are a particular subset of mesenchymal stem cells present in the stromal vascular fraction of the adipose tissue. The aim of our work was to compare the ability of ADSCs and fibroblast to produce in vitro a scaffolding material, both in terms of collagen and fibronectin production. ADSCs turned out to be capable of efficiently producing a collagen and fibronectin-containing dermal matrix upon stimulation with ascorbic acid. We observed fibronectin and collagen production by ADSCs to be even more abundant when compared to fibroblasts'. Our results support the use of ADSC-induced sheets instead of fibroblast-based dermal substitutes as wound-healing strategies in full-thickness skin injuries.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCells, CulturedCollagenExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsFibronectinsHumansPrimary Cell CultureSkinStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research