Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers for Vascular Disease

Costa D., Andreucci M., Ielapi N., Faga T., Mazza A., Accarino G.

Narrative Review on Peripheral Artery Disease, Stroke Research, Chronic Wound, published in Biomolecules (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomolecules (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42072729
PMCID
PMC13114951
DOI
10.3390/biom16040608

Abstract (original English)

Vascular diseases (VD) remain a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, often developing silently before manifesting as severe complications like stroke or ischemia. Traditional diagnostic imaging provides essential anatomical data but frequently fails to capture the dynamic molecular processes underlying vascular pathology. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding Extracellular Vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies, as emerging biomarkers and mediators in vascular conditions. The review evaluates the biological mechanisms of EVs across several disorders, including arterial aneurysms, peripheral artery disease, carotid stenosis, and venous thromboembolism. Findings indicate that EVs concentration and molecular cargo, particularly microRNAs and proteins, reflect the physiological state of parent cells, offering a "liquid biopsy" for vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and plaque vulnerability. Furthermore, the review explores the therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived EVs in promoting angiogenesis and tissue repair in chronic vascular ulcers. Despite these advances, the review concludes that the clinical implementation of EV-based diagnostics faces significant hurdles, primarily due to the lack of standardized isolation and characterization methods. Addressing these methodological challenges is crucial

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansVascular DiseasesBiomarkersExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research