Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Fat grafting accelerates revascularisation and decreases fibrosis following thermal injury.

Sultan SM., Barr JS., Butala P., Davidson EH., Weinstein AL., Knobel D.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 20 on Burns, Scar, published in J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2011)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
20
Source database
PubMed
PMID
21962530
DOI
10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.046
Citations
76

Abstract (original English)

Fat grafting has been shown clinically to improve the quality of burn scars. To date, no study has explored the mechanism of this effect. We aimed to do so by combining our murine model of fat grafting with a previously described murine model of thermal injury. Wild-type FVB mice (n=20) were anaesthetised, shaved and depilitated. Brass rods were heated to 100°C in a hot water bath before being applied to the dorsum of the mice for 10s, yielding a full-thickness injury. Following a 2-week recovery period, the mice underwent Doppler scanning before being fat/sham grafted with 1.5cc of human fat/saline. Half were sacrificed 4 weeks following grafting, and half were sacrificed 8 weeks following grafting. Both groups underwent repeat Doppler scanning immediately prior to sacrifice. Burn scar samples were taken following sacrifice at both time points for protein quantification, CD31 staining and Picrosirius red staining. Doppler scanning demonstrated significantly greater flux in fat-grafted animals than saline-grafted animals at 4 weeks (fat=305±15.77mV, saline=242±15.83mV; p=0.026). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis in fat-grafted animals demonstrated significant increase in vasculogenic proteins at 4 weeks (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF): fat=74.3±4.39ngml(-1), saline=34.3±5.23ngml(-1); p=0.004) (stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1): fat=51.8±1.23ngml(

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBurnsDisease Models, AnimalFibrosisFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalMiceMicrocirculationRegional Blood Flow

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research