Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Fibula osteo-adipofascial flap for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction.

Smith ML., Clarke-Pearson E., Dayan JH.

Retrospective Study on Chronic Wound, published in Head Neck (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Head Neck (2011)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
22025346
DOI
10.1002/hed.21947

Abstract (original English)

The fibula free flap is a reliable method for reconstructing composite head and neck defects. However, its skin paddle has drawbacks, including its thickness, hair-bearing surface, desquamation, difficulty insetting it into maxillary defects, and the potential need for skin-grafting the donor site. The fibula osteo-adipofascial flap (FOAFF) is a modification of the fibula flap that overcomes these problems. A retrospective study of 6 consecutive patients who underwent FOAFF reconstruction was evaluated for outcomes and complications. The mean follow-up was 22.6 months. All flaps survived, with complete oral mucosalization by 7 weeks. Four patients had dental implants placed at the time of reconstruction. Two patients received radiation therapy. Aside from loss of the labial sulcus in anterior maxillary reconstructions, complications were negligible. The FOAFF is useful for reconstructing defects requiring bone, soft tissue, and mucosal replacement without the disadvantages of the traditional fibula skin paddle.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultAgedBone TransplantationDental ImplantsEstheticsFasciaFemaleFibulaFollow-Up Studies

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research