Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Heart-derived endogenous stem cells.

Inouye K., White G., Khan S., Luba J., Benharash P., Thankam FG.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Mol Biol Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mol Biol Rep (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40928598
PMCID
PMC12423225
DOI
10.1007/s11033-025-11001-4
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Regenerative cardiology has emerged as a novel strategy to improve cardiac healing following ischemic injury. While stem-cell-mediated cardiac regeneration has garnered much attention as a promising strategy, its value remains debated owing to the lack of ideal stem cell source candidates. Resident/endogenous cardiac-derived stromal cells (CSCs) exhibit superior therapeutic potential due to their innate abilities to differentiate into cardiac cells, especially cardiomyocytes (CM). Emerging research has highlighted diverse endogenous CSCs phenotypes and sub-types as candidates for cardiac repair. Interestingly, CSCs promote healing through angiogenesis and regenerative paracrine signaling along with replenishing CM, and CM-like cells in the ischemic heart. Unfortunately, the clonogenic properties and translational potential of CSCs are minimally explored. This review examines the healing promise of a myriad CSCs such as c-kit + cardiac cells, Sca-1 + cells, cardiosphere-derived cells, side population cells, Bm1 + cells, cardiac atrial appendage cells, cardiac adipose cells, epicardial cells, and Isl1 + cells. Also, the review highlights the areas of improvement regarding the therapeutic applications of CSC to extrapolate into the clinical arena of cardiac management.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsStem CellsCell DifferentiationMyocardiumStem Cell TransplantationRegenerationRegenerative Medicine

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research