Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

How to explain the beneficial effects of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin

Blanco J., García A., Hermida-Nogueira L., Castro AB.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in Periodontol 2000 (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Periodontol 2000 (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
38923566
PMCID
PMC11808445
DOI
10.1111/prd.12570
Citations
23

Abstract (original English)

The survival of an organism relies on its ability to repair the damage caused by trauma, toxic agents, and inflammation. This process involving cell proliferation and differentiation is driven by several growth factors and is critically dependent on the organization of the extracellular matrix. Since autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) are fibrin matrices in which cells, growth factors, and cytokines are trapped and delivered over time, they are able to influence that response at different levels. The present review thoroughly describes the molecular components present in one of these APCs, leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), and summarizes the level of evidence regarding the influence of L-PRF on anti-inflammatory reactions, analgesia, hemostasis, antimicrobial capacity, and its biological mechanisms on bone/soft tissue regeneration.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Blood PlateletsLeukocytesHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsFibrinBone RegenerationHemostasisPlatelet-Rich Fibrin

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research