Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Hydrogels for Bone Repair: Construction Strategies and Applications

Wang M., Su Q., Wu Y., Liang X., Zhou F., Jing Y.

Narrative Review on Immune Modulation, published in Smart Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Smart Med (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42079424
PMCID
PMC13131083
DOI
10.1002/smmd.70036
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Bone injuries, particularly those associated with an aging global population, pose a persistent and complex clinical challenge. Current gold-standard treatments such as autografts, allografts, and metal implants, are often limited by immune rejection and mechanical mismatch. In this context, hydrogels are promising biomaterials for bone regeneration, due not only to inherent biocompatibility, high hydration, and tunable elasticity but also to the ability to mimic the native bone micro environment. This review presents a critical and comprehensive analysis of how hydrogels for bone repair are designed, constructed, and functionalized to achieve the desired regenerative performance. It systematically examines multiple hydrogel types, centering on the design of their strength and biodegradation features to better align with the functional demands of bone healing. Furthermore, the review summarizes that by incorporating bioactive molecules, nanomaterials, or cells, advanced functionalization can orchestrate osteogenesis and angiogenesis. In vitro and in vivo studies evidenced the performance of hydrogels' applications ranging from bone fracture repair to smart, stimuli-responsive platforms for personalized regenerative medicine. This review finally identifies the prevailing translational challenges and suggests future research trajectories.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research