Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays

Suarez-Arnedo A., Torres Figueroa F., Clavijo C., Arbeláez P., Cruz JC., Muñoz-Camargo C.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
PLoS One (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
32722676
PMCID
PMC7386569
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0232565
Citations
623

Abstract (original English)

In vitro scratch wound healing assay, a simple and low-cost technique that works along with other image analysis tools, is one of the most widely used 2D methods to determine the cellular migration and proliferation in processes such as regeneration and disease. There are open-source programs such as imageJ to analyze images of in vitro scratch wound healing assays, but these tools require manual tuning of various parameters, which is time-consuming and limits image throughput. For that reason, we developed an optimized plugin for imageJ to automatically recognize the wound healing size, correct the average wound width by considering its inclination, and quantify other important parameters such as: area, wound area fraction, average wound width, and width deviation of the wound images obtained from a scratch/ wound healing assay. Our plugin is easy to install and can be used with different operating systems. It can be adapted to analyze both individual images and stacks. Additionally, it allows the analysis of images obtained from bright field, phase contrast, and fluorescence microscopes. In conclusion, this new imageJ plugin is a robust tool to automatically standardize and facilitate quantification of different in vitro wound parameters with high accuracy compared with other tools and manual identification.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell LineKeratinocytesMesenchymal Stem CellsHumansCulture Media, ConditionedReproducibility of ResultsWound HealingCell MovementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftware

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research