Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

An immunohistochemical and biomechanical evaluation of the effect of fat graft on tendon healing.

Oztermeli A., Okyay MF.

Animal Study on Tendon Injury, Chronic Wound, published in J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) (2023)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38051958
DOI
10.1177/10225536231220839
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Aim To investigate the efficacy of fat grafting in primary tendon healing through immunohistochemical and biomechanical examinations. Material and method The study material comprised a total of 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats, each approximately 10 weeks old. All 10 rats were operated on bilaterally. The right Achilles tendon in all the animals was defined as the study group. The tendon was cut and then repaired, and then fat graft was applied to the repair area. The left Achilles tendon of all the rats constituted the control group. The tendon was cut and repaired with no further application. After 4 weeks, the rats were euthanised and samples were taken from the tendons for immunohistochemical and biomechanical examinations. Results In the biomechanical evaluations, no statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of peak load and stiffness values ( p : .068, p : .089, respectively). In the histopathological evaluation, the tenocyte value of the study group was superior to that of the control group ( p : .04). No statistically significant differences were determined between the groups in respect of the other histopathological parameters. In the immunohistochemical evaluations, the type I collagen and TGF values of the study group were found to be higher than those of the control group ( p : .011, p : .012, respectively). Conclusion Compared to

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
RatsMaleAnimalsRats, Sprague-DawleyWound HealingBiomechanical PhenomenaCollagenAchilles Tendon

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research