Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMedOpen access

The Immunomodulatory mechanism and research progress of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Ye YM., Zhao YX., Xiang LR., Zou CY., Xiao H., Lu H.

Clinical Trial on Immune Modulation, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2025)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40251675
PMCID
PMC12008879
DOI
10.1186/s13287-025-04333-2
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Background Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects 10-40% of the global population, yet current therapies (drugs, immunotherapy) face limitations in efficacy and safety. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising alternative due to their immunomodulatory properties. Key findings Preclinical studies demonstrate that MSCs from adipose, bone marrow, umbilical cord, and tonsils reduce AR symptoms (sneezing, nasal inflammation) and serum IgE (Immunoglobulin E) levels by restoring Th1/Th2 immune equilibrium and enhancing Treg (Regulatory T cells) activity. MSC-derived exosomes and hydrogel-encapsulated formulations further improve targeting and safety. However, clinical translation is hindered by heterogeneous protocols and unresolved long-term risks (e.g., tumorigenicity). Clinical significance MSC-based therapies offer potential for durable AR remission by addressing immune dysregulation at its root. Future efforts must prioritize standardized production, phase I safety trials, and combination strategies (e.g., exosomes + hydrogels) to accelerate clinical adoption.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansMesenchymal Stem CellsRhinitis, AllergicMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationImmunomodulationAnimalsExosomes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research