Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

The Importance of Pericytes in Healing: Wounds and other Pathologies

Thomas H., Cowin AJ., Mills SJ.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Int J Mol Sci (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2017)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
28538706
PMCID
PMC5485953
DOI
10.3390/ijms18061129
Citations
49

Abstract (original English)

Much of current research investigates the beneficial properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a treatment for wounds and other forms of injury. In this review, we bring attention to and discuss the role of the pericyte, a cell type which shares much of the differentiation potential and regenerative properties of the MSC as well as specific roles in the regulation of angiogenesis, inflammation and fibrosis. Pericytes have been identified as dysfunctional or depleted in many disease states, and observing the outcomes of pericyte perturbation in models of disease and wound healing informs our understanding of overall pericyte function and identifies these cells as an important target in the development of therapies to encourage healing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
PericytesMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansInflammationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound HealingNeovascularization, Physiologic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research