Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Improving Cutaneous Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice Using Naturally Derived Tissue-Engineered Biological Dressings Produced under Serum-Free Conditions.

Safoine M., Paquette C., Gingras GM., Fradette J.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Stem Cells Int (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Stem Cells Int (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38737365
DOI
10.1155/2024/3601101

Abstract (original English)

Long-term diabetes often leads to chronic wounds refractory to treatment. Cell-based therapies are actively investigated to enhance cutaneous healing. Various cell types are available to produce biological dressings, such as adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs), an attractive cell source considering their abundancy, accessibility, and therapeutic secretome. In this study, we produced human ASC-based dressings under a serum-free culture system using the self-assembly approach of tissue engineering. The dressings were applied every 4 days to full-thickness 8-mm splinted skin wounds created on the back of polygenic diabetic NONcNZO10/LtJ mice and streptozotocin-induced diabetic K14-H2B-GFP mice. Global wound closure kinetics evaluated macroscopically showed accelerated wound closure in both murine models, especially for NONcNZO10/LtJ; the treated group reaching 98.7% ± 2.3% global closure compared to 76.4% ± 11.8% for the untreated group on day 20 ( p =0.0002). Histological analyses revealed that treated wounds exhibited healed skin of better quality with a well-differentiated epidermis and a more organized, homogeneous, and 1.6-fold thicker granulation tissue. Neovascularization, assessed by CD31 labeling, was 2.5-fold higher for the NONcNZO10/LtJ treated wounds. We thus describe the beneficial impact on wound healing of biologically active ASC-based dressings produced under

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research