Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies

Kim SR., Lee HY.

Narrative Review on Hip, published in Theranostics (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Theranostics (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41346706
PMCID
PMC12674934
DOI
10.7150/thno.123298

Abstract (original English)

Endometrial regeneration remains a significant clinical challenge for women with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), thin endometrium, or uterine factor infertility, conditions that severely impair fertility and reproductive outcomes. Traditional hormonal and surgical interventions often fail to restore the structural and functional integrity of damaged endometrial tissue. This review comprehensively examines integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration, focusing on the synergistic applications of biomaterials, stem cells, organoids, and organ-on-a-chip technologies. Natural polymers such as collagen, gelatin, alginate, hyaluronic acid, and synthetic polymers including PCL, PLA, PGA, and PLGA have been comprehensively evaluated for their ability to mimic extracellular matrix, support cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and modulate immune responses. The incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells, extracellular vesicles, and growth factors into bioengineered scaffolds, such as hydrogels and nanofiber membranes, enhances regenerative efficacy. Furthermore, emerging platforms, such as endometrial organoids, 3D bioprinting, and organ-on-a-chip systems, offer physiologically relevant models for precision regenerative medicine. Innovations such as AI-assisted monitoring, 4D printing, and advanced drug delivery systems represent transformative approaches to overcome curren

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
EndometriumOrganoidsStem CellsAnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringRegenerative MedicineRegenerationFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research