Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Intraosseous Delivery of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Bone and Hematological Diseases

Artamonov MY., Sokov EL.

Narrative Review on Immune Modulation, published in Curr Issues Mol Biol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Curr Issues Mol Biol (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39590346
PMCID
PMC11592824
DOI
10.3390/cimb46110752
Citations
7

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem cells are used most in regenerative medicine due to their capacities in differentiation and immune modulation. The intraosseous injection of MSC into the bone has been recommended because of expected outcomes for retention, bioavailability, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy, particularly in conditions involving the bone, such as osteoporosis and osteonecrosis. A review of the intraosseous delivery of mesenchymal stem cells in comparison with intravenous and intra-arterial delivery methods will be subjected to critical examination. This delivery mode fares better regarding paracrine signaling and immunomodulation attributes, which are the cornerstone of tissue regeneration and inflammation reduction. The local complications and technical challenges still apply with this method. This study was more focused on further research soon to be conducted to further elucidate long-term safety and efficacy of intraosseous mesenchymal stem cell therapy. Though much has been achieved with very impressive progress in this field, it is worth noting that more studies need to be put into place so that this technique can be established as a routine approach, especially with further research in biomaterials, gene therapy, and personalized medicine.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research