Is it time to revisit the Pedersen hypothesis in the face of the obesity epidemic?
Catalano PM., Hauguel-De Mouzon S.
Narrative Review on Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, published in Am J Obstet Gynecol (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Am J Obstet Gynecol (2011)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 21288502
- PMCID
- PMC3130827
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.039
- Citations
- 252
Abstract (original English)
The Pedersen hypothesis was formulated more than 50 years ago. Jorgen Pedersen primarily cared for women with type 1 diabetes. He suggested that fetal overgrowth was related to increased transplacental transfer of glucose, stimulating the release of insulin by the fetal beta cell and subsequent macrosomia. Optimal maternal glucose control decreased perinatal mortality and morbidity. However, over the ensuing decades, there have been increases in maternal obesity and subsequently gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes. The underlying pathophysiology of type 1 and GDM/type 2 diabetes are fundamentally different, type 1 diabetes being primarily a disorder of beta cell failure and type 2 diabetes/GDM including both insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. As such the metabolic milieu in which the developing fetus is exposed may be quite different in type 1 diabetes and obesity. In this review we examine the metabolic environment of obese diabetic women and lipid metabolism affecting fetal adiposity. The importance of understanding these issues relates to the increasing trends of obesity worldwide with perinatal programming of metabolic dysfunction in the offspring.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Transforming hypoglycemia prediction in adult type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis for precision care
Meta-analysis on Type 1 Diabetes, published in Open Life Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Open Life Sci - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Long-term storage, cryopreservation, and culture of isolated human islets: a systematic review
Systematic Review on Type 1 Diabetes, published in Front Transplant (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Change in Viability and Function of Pancreatic Islets after Coculture with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Type 1 Diabetes, published in J Diabetes Res (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2020
J Diabetes Res7 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of metabolomics-based risks and benefits
Meta-analysis on Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, published in Stem Cell Investig (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2018
Stem Cell Investig22 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Clinical Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 524 on Type 1 Diabetes, published in PLoS One (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2016
- n = 524
PLoS One81 citations - Level BClinical TrialEurope PMC
Stem Cell-Derived Beta-Cell Therapies: Encapsulation Advances and Immunological Hurdles in Diabetes Treatment
Clinical Trial on Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, Scar, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cells1 citations