Large-breast reconstruction using fat graft only after prosthetic reconstruction failure.
Panettiere P., Accorsi D., Marchetti L., Sgrò F., Sbarbati A.
Case Report / Series on Chronic Wound, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Case Report / Series
- Journal
- Aesthetic Plast Surg (2011)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 21359982
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00266-011-9670-7
Abstract (original English)
When prosthetic reconstruction fails, and in the case of absolute contraindications to flaps use, no common reconstructive option is available. A large irradiated breast was reconstructed using only fat grafts (9 sessions) after prosthetic reconstruction failure (exposure of implant) due to absolute contraindications to general anesthesia and unavailability of large flaps. During the first four sessions small volumes were implanted in the extremely rigid and retracted tissues with regenerative purposes. Larger volumes were implanted during the last five sessions to improve volume and shape. A pleasant aesthetic result was achieved. Tissue regeneration with good vascular support was evident at ultrasonography and magnetic resonance. Histologic and ultrastructural examination of the new tissue showed normal adipose tissue with cell and vasculostromal maturation aspects. No degenerative or inflammatory aspects were present. Fat graft transplantation can be a reliable and safe option for breast reconstruction in selected patients.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Safety of Fat Graft Myringoplasty Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma for Managing Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 522 on Chronic Wound, published in Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 522
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Best evidence summary for platelet-rich plasma treatment of chronic wounds
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Regen Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Regen Ther - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Dedifferentiation of Mature Adipocytes and Their Future Potential for Regenerative Medicine Applications
Systematic Review on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, published in Biomedicines (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Biomedicines - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
PLoS One1 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol