Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Leave the fat, skip the bolster: thinking outside the box in lower third nasal reconstruction.

Hubbard TJ.

Narrative Review with a reported sample of 29 on Chronic Wound, Scar, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2004) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2004)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
29
Source database
PubMed
PMID
15509929
DOI
10.1097/01.prs.0000138817.14320.ec

Abstract (original English)

Defects of the lower third of the nose often present especially challenging reconstructive dilemmas. The surrounding skin to match is often thick, sebaceous, and sun damaged, none of which characterizes the historically ideal periauricular donor skin for grafting. The surrounding nasal skin is quite stiff, precluding very small local flaps. To avoid the "misplaced patch" appearance of most classic full-thickness grafts to this area or the depressed scar of an elliptical excision, many surgeons turn to larger local or regional flaps. These provide not only skin color and texture match but also the necessary several millimeters of subcutaneous fat necessary for proper tip aesthetics. Many defects of the lower third are small, making many surgeons reluctant to employ these larger flaps with their long scars and potential to twist or distort delicate tip or ala anatomy. The author has sought a means to transport skin and subcutaneous fat for lower third nasal defects outside of flaps. On the basis of the superiority of nasolabial fold scars and a vast positive experience in the literature utilizing skin and fat composite grafts with no bolsters, the author applied these techniques to 33 lower third nasal defects in 29 patients. Of 33 grafts varying in size from 4 mm circular to 17 mm x 16 mm and retaining 1 to 5 mm of fat, no grafts were lost. Four grafts developed a 30 percent are

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAgedBasal Cell CarcinomaEar, ExternalEstheticsFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research