Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

Lipoaspirate fluid derived factors and extracellular vesicles accelerate wound healing in a rat burn model.

Wu Y., Hong P., Liu P., Zhang Q., Zhang Y., Yang B.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, Scar, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2023)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37425361
PMCID
PMC10324973
DOI
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1185251
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Background: The regenerative capabilities of derivatives derived from the fat layer of lipoaspirate have been demonstrated. However, the large volume of lipoaspirate fluid has not attracted extensive attention in clinical applications. In this study, we aimed to isolate the factors and extracellular vesicles from human lipoaspirate fluid and evaluate their potential therapeutic efficacy. Methods: Lipoaspirate fluid derived factors and extracellular vesicles (LF-FVs) were prepared from human lipoaspirate and characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis, size-exclusion chromatography and adipokine antibody arrays. The therapeutic potential of LF-FVs was evaluated on fibroblasts in vitro and rat burn model in vivo . Wound healing process was recorded on days 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 16 post-treatment. The scar formation was analyzed by histology, immunofluorescent staining and scar-related gene expression at day 35 post-treatment. Results: The results of nanoparticle tracking analysis and size-exclusion chromatography indicated that LF-FVs were enriched with proteins and extracellular vesicles. Specific adipokines (adiponectin and IGF-1) were detected in LF-FVs. In vitro , LF-FVs augmented the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo , the results showed that LF-FVs significantly accelerated burn wound healing. Moreover, LF-FVs improved the qual

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research