Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Lipofilling-A Regenerative Alternate for Remodeling Burn Scars: A Clinico-Immunohistopathological Study.

Jatin B., Karki D., Ahluwalia C., Muthukumar V., Karki D.

Prospective Study on Burns, Scar, published in Indian J Plast Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Indian J Plast Surg (2023)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37705812
PMCID
PMC10497342
DOI
10.1055/s-0043-1771515
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Any injury involving the dermis will lead to scarring. Scar tissue can cause functional limitations, cosmetic impairments, pain, and itch. Adipose-derived stem cells have also been shown to play a role in scar modulation. This study evaluates changes in lipofilled scar over the period of time and compares it with non-lipofilled scar tissue. Materials and Methods A prospective case-control study with intraindividual follow-up was performed on 30 adult patients with post-burn scars from November 2016 to May 2019. Clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical parameters were assessed among the case and control regions of the scar. Results Mean age of the study population was 30.6 years. The duration of the scar included in this study ranged from 1 to 28 years, with a mean duration of 5.91 years. There was a significant reduction in pain, itch, stiffness, and an increase in the pliability of the scar, and a substantial improvement in the modified Vancouver Scar Score in the lipofilled group. In histopathological analysis, the case group showed organized parallel collagen fibers, a significant reduction in melanocytes, improvement in vascularity, and a significantly increased amount of collagen fibers at the reticular dermis. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated new cell synthesis in the scar tissue and reduced melanocytes. Conclusion The remodeling effect of a

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research