Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Long non-coding RNA MIAT in development and disease: a new player in an old game

Sun C., Huang L., Li Z., Leng K., Xu Y., Jiang X.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in J Biomed Sci (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Biomed Sci (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29534728
PMCID
PMC5851271
DOI
10.1186/s12929-018-0427-3
Citations
85

Abstract (original English)

Background Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are a portion of non-protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), have manifested a paramount role in the pathophysiology of human diseases, particularly in pathogenesis and progression of disease. Myocardial infarction associated transcript (MIAT), which was recently found to demonstrate aberrant expression in various diseases, such as myocardial infarction, schizophrenia, ischemic stroke, diabetic complications, age-related cataract and cancers, is a novel disease-related lncRNA. This work summarize current evidence regarding the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of lncRNA MIAT during disease development. Short conclusion LncRNA MIAT likely represents a feasible cancer biomarker or therapeutic target.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansMyocardial InfarctionRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorNoncommunicable Diseases

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research