Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Manipulating immune activity of macrophages: a materials and mechanics perspective

Clevenger AJ., Jha A., Moore E., Raghavan SA.

Narrative Review on Immune Modulation, published in Trends Biotechnol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Trends Biotechnol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39155172
PMCID
PMC11717646
DOI
10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.07.009
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

Macrophage immune cells exist on a plastic spectrum of phenotypes governed by their physical and biochemical environment. Controlling macrophage function to facilitate immunological regeneration or fighting pathology has emerged as a therapeutic possibility. The rate-limiting step in translating macrophage immunomodulation therapies has been the absence of fundamental knowledge of how physics and biochemistry in the macrophage microenvironment converge to inform phenotype. In this review we explore recent trends in bioengineered model systems that integrate physical and biochemical variables applied to macrophage mechanosensing and plasticity. We focus on how tuning of mechanical forces and biomaterial composition orchestrate macrophage function in physiological and pathological contexts. Ultimately, a broader understanding of stimuli-responsiveness in macrophages leads to informed design for future modulatory therapies.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
MacrophagesAnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsMechanotransduction, Cellular

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research