Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Mapping the knowledge of omics in myocardial infarction: A scientometric analysis in R Studio, VOSviewer, Citespace, and SciMAT

Wei X., Wang M., Yu S., Han Z., Li C., Zhong Y.

Laboratory Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Medicine (Baltimore) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39960900
PMCID
PMC11835070
DOI
10.1097/md.0000000000041368
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Many researchers nowadays choose multi-omics techniques for myocardial infarction studies. However, there's yet to be a review article integrating myocardial infarction multi-omics. Hence, this study adopts the popular bibliometrics. Based on its principles, we use software like R Studio, Vosviewer, Citespace, and SciMAT to analyze literature data of myocardial infarction omics research (1991-2022) from Web of Science. By extracting key information and calculating weights, we conduct analyses from 4 aspects: Collaboration Network Analysis, Co-word Analysis, Citing and Cited Journal Analysis, and Co-citation and Clustering Analysis, aiming to understand the field's cooperation, research topic evolution, and knowledge flow. The results show that myocardial infarction omics research is still in its early stage with limited international cooperation. In terms of knowledge flow, there's no significant difference within the discipline, but non-biomedical disciplines have joined, indicating an interdisciplinary integration trend. In the overall research field, genomics remains the main topic with many breakthroughs identifying susceptibility sites. Meanwhile, other omics fields like lipidomics and proteomics are also progressing, clarifying the pathogenesis. The cooperation details in this article enable researchers to connect with others, facilitating their research. The evolution tr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansMyocardial InfarctionProteomicsGenomicsBibliometrics

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research