Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Mapping theme trends and knowledge structure on adipose-derived stem cells: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2017.

Shi B., Wei W., Qin X., Zhao F., Duan Y., Sun W.

Laboratory Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Regen Med (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Regen Med (2018)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30547725
DOI
10.2217/rme-2018-0117
Citations
11

Abstract (original English)

Aim To investigate the theme trends and knowledge structure of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) related literatures by using bibliometric analysis. Materials & methods Co-word analysis, strategic diagram and social network analysis were employed. Results In line with strategic diagrams, ADSC differentiation and transplantation as main undeveloped themes in 2003-2007 were partially replaced by regeneration medicine and ADSCs for myocardial infarction in 2008 to 2012, and then partially replaced by miRNAs in ADSC genetics and nerve regeneration in 2013 to 2017. Based on social network analysis, regenerative medicine/methods, myocardial infarction/therapy, as well as miRNAs/genetics, and nerve regeneration/physiology were considered the emerging hot spots in 2008 to 2012 and 2013 to 2017. Conclusion The undeveloped themes and emerging hot spots could be considered as new research topics.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineResearch

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research