Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Mapping the Tissue-of-Origins of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Injury Repair

Tang XT., Liu YL., Du YA., Wang SS., Zhou BO.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Adv Sci (Weinh) (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41309504
PMCID
PMC12806335
DOI
10.1002/advs.202509533
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Culture-expanded mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are capable of fostering tissue regeneration after transplantation. However, the behavior and physiological role of endogenous MSCs in distal organ repair remain undetermined. In this study, a suite of genetic tools is generated to distinguish MSCs between tissues, and to map their fate in local, proximate, and distal organ repair. By single-cell RNA-sequencing, it is found that the transcriptomic profiles of most non-bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (nonBM-MSCs) exhibited high similarities, yet differed from that of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs), especially in their less abundant secretome. Fate-mapping experiments demonstrated that BM-MSCs do not contribute to the formation of myofibroblasts during fibrosis or cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) during tumorigenesis. In contrast, MSCs from proximate tissues actively migrated to the site of bone fracture, where they contributed to the formation of fibrocartilaginous soft callus. During injury-associated inflammation, local MSCs modulated the polarization of tissue-resident macrophages, whereas BM-MSCs mobilized monocytes to the site of inflammation. Conditional deletion of Ccl2 in BM-MSCs, but not in colon-resident MSCs, ameliorated colon inflammation and restored body weight after colitis. Thus, injury repair is orchestrated by MSCs from

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsMice, Inbred C57BLHumansMiceWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research