Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Matrix metalloproteinases: drug targets for myocardial infarction

Yabluchanskiy A., Li Y., Chilton RJ., Lindsey ML.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Curr Drug Targets (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Curr Drug Targets (2013)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
23316962
PMCID
PMC3828124
DOI
10.2174/138945013804999007
Citations
41

Abstract (original English)

Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Rapid advances in the treatment of acute MI have significantly improved short-term outcomes in patients, due in large part to successes in preventing myocardial cell death and limiting infarct area during the time of ischemia and subsequent reperfusion. Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) play key roles in post-MI cardiac remodeling and in the development of adverse outcomes. This review highlights the importance of MMPs in the injury and remodeling response of the left ventricle and also discusses their potential as therapeutic targets Additional pre-clinical and clinical research is needed to further investigate and understand the cardioprotective effects of MMPs inhibitors.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
MacrophagesAnimalsHumansMyocardial InfarctionCollagenProteoglycansFibronectinsLamininCell MovementNeutrophil Infiltration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research