Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Maturation strategies and limitations of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Wu P., Deng G., Sai X., Guo H., Huang H., Zhu P.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Biosci Rep (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biosci Rep (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33057659
PMCID
PMC8209171
DOI
10.1042/bsr20200833
Citations
73

Abstract (original English)

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the ability to differentiate into cardiomyocytes (CMs). They are not only widely used in cardiac pharmacology screening, human heart disease modeling, and cell transplantation-based treatments, but also the most promising source of CMs for experimental and clinical applications. However, their use is largely restricted by the immature phenotype of structure and function, which is similar to embryonic or fetal CMs and has certain differences from adult CMs. In order to overcome this critical issue, many studies have explored and revealed new strategies to induce the maturity of iPSC-CMs. Therefore, this article aims to review recent induction methods of mature iPSC-CMs, related mechanisms, and limitations.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cells, CulturedMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsHumansHeart DiseasesCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ShapeCell SurvivalCalcium Signaling

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research