Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMC

Mechanism of Action of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs): impact of delivery method

Bagno LL., Salerno AG., Balkan W., Hare JM.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, published in Expert Opin Biol Ther (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Expert Opin Biol Ther (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34882517
PMCID
PMC8934282
DOI
10.1080/14712598.2022.2016695
Citations
60

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; AKA mesenchymal stem cells) stimulate healing and reduce inflammation. Promising therapeutic responses are seen in many late-phase clinical trials, but others have not satisfied their primary endpoints, making translation of MSCs into clinical practice difficult. These inconsistencies may be related to the route of MSC delivery, lack of product optimization, or varying background therapies received in clinical trials over time. Areas covered Here we discuss the different routes of MSC delivery, highlighting the proposed mechanism(s) of therapeutic action as well as potential safety concerns. PubMed search criteria used: MSC plus: local administration; routes of administration; delivery methods; mechanism of action; therapy in different diseases. Expert opinion Direct injection of MSCs using a controlled local delivery approach appears to have benefits in certain disease states, but further studies are required to make definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of one delivery method over another.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research