Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background In recent years, the number of animal studies investigating mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) therapy for osteochondral defects has steadily increased. However, a comprehensive and systematic quantitative analysis is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MSC-EVs in animal models of osteochondral defect through a meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 31, 2025, to identify and select preclinical studies on MSC-EVs therapy for osteochondral defect models. No restrictions were applied regarding the specific characteristics of MSC-EVs or animal models. A random-effects model was used to perform pooled analyses of osteochondral repair scores, bone structural parameters, and histological scores. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses, funnel plots, and Egger's test were employed to assess the robustness and stability of the results. Results A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. MSC-EVs intervention improved International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and Modified O'Driscoll Scale (MODS) scores at both 3 and 6 months, and significantly increased BV/TV, Tb.Th, as well as histological scores of cartilage and subchondral bone. Subgroup analyses indicated that none of the exami

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.