Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for type 2 diabetes: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future directions.

Zarei M.

Clinical Trial on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Wound, Immune Modulation, published in Mol Biol Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Mol Biol Rep (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41117868
DOI
10.1007/s11033-025-11133-7

Abstract (original English)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global public-health challenge characterized by insulin resistance, progressive β-cell dysfunction, and chronic low-grade inflammation. Conventional therapies often control glycaemia but do not consistently prevent disease progression or complications. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and the umbilical cord, have been investigated for T2DM due to their immunomodulatory and paracrine regenerative properties. Preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials (2000-2025) have reported modest improvements in glycaemic indices, including mean reductions in HbA1c and decreases in exogenous insulin requirements in some cohorts, rather than the uniform 1-2% reduction previously stated. Signals of benefit have also been described in diabetic complications such as nephropathy and wound healing. However, these findings derive largely from small, heterogeneous studies with short follow-up, and should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Recent strategies to enhance MSC efficacy (for example, genetic modification such as OCN-19 overexpression) show preliminary promise but require more rigorous evaluation. Key challenges that currently limit clinical translation include variability in MSC sources and manufacturing, impaired cell function in the diabetic microenvironment, small and underpowered trials, and limited

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimals

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research