Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal stem cells added to second-line therapy improve response and failure-free survival in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A meta-analys

Xiao M., Yan Y., Zhang R., Wang D., Wang L., Zhao Y.

Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 650 on Immune Modulation, published in Front Oncol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
Front Oncol (2025)
Reported sample size
650
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41262904
PMCID
PMC12623177
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2025.1704963

Abstract (original English)

Background Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), with limited effective treatment options. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach due to their immunomodulatory and tissue-repair properties. However, inconsistent results existed. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating MSCs plus second-line therapy versus second-line therapy alone in patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to pool risk ratios (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Four RCTs comprising 650 patients were included. MSC administration significantly improved overall response (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.23, P = 0.007) and complete response rates (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.19-1.70, P Conclusions The addition of MSCs to second-line therapy significantly improves treatment response, reduces chronic GVHD incidence, and prolongs failure-free survival in patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD, with a favorable safety profile. These findings support MSC-based therapy as a promising strategy for this high-ris

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research