Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewPubMedOpen access

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications and Regenerative Outcomes.

Dipalma G., Marinelli G., Palumbo I., Guglielmo M., Riccaldo L., Morolla R.

Systematic Review on Immune Modulation, published in J Clin Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
J Clin Med (2025)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40507385
PMCID
PMC12155250
DOI
10.3390/jcm14113623
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Aim : This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of mesenchymal stem cells, particularly those derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and dental pulp in maxillofacial and oral surgery, focusing on their regenerative potential, clinical applications, and integration with biomaterials. Introduction : Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent stem cells known for their immunomodulatory and regenerative abilities. Their low immunogenicity and differentiation capacity make them ideal for treating craniofacial defects and enhancing soft tissue repair. Materials and Methods : The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The literature was searched across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2009 to 2024. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for clinical efficacy and methodological quality. Results : Clinical trials demonstrated the safety and regenerative benefits of mesenchymal stem cell in bone and soft tissue reconstruction. Adipose-derived stem cell and dental pulp stem cell showed favorable outcomes in angiogenesis and healing, while bone marrow's cell proved effective in bone regeneration, particularly when combined with scaffolds. Discussion and Conclusions : Although results are promising, limitations remain in consistency and long-term outcomes. Optimizing scaffold integration, preservation methods, and delivery techniqu

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research