Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Perianal Crohn's Disease

Carvello M., Lightner A., Yamamoto T., Kotze PG., Spinelli A.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, Autoimmune Research, published in Cells (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Cells (2019)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31340546
PMCID
PMC6679174
DOI
10.3390/cells8070764
Citations
69

Abstract (original English)

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD) is associated with significant morbidity and might negatively impact the quality of life of CD patients. In the last two decades, the management of PFCD has evolved in terms of the multidisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. However, the highest fistula healing rates, even combining surgical and anti-TNF agents, reaches 50% of treated patients. More recently, the administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown notable promising results in the treatment of PFCD. The aim of this review is to describe the rationale and the possible mechanism of action of MSC application for PFCD and the most recent results of randomized clinical trials. Furthermore, the unmet needs of the current administration process and the expected next steps to improve the outcomes will be addressed.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansMiceRectal FistulaCrohn DiseaseMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound HealingQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research