Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal stem cells in systemic sclerosis therapy

Dudek DW., Walczuk E., Wajda A., Paradowska-Gorycka A.

Clinical Trial on Autoimmune Research, published in Reumatologia (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Reumatologia (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33227099
PMCID
PMC7667949
DOI
10.5114/reum.2020.99995
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disorder with a high mortality rate. There are still many unknowns concerning the pathophysiology of this disease, due to its clinical heterogeneity. Since there is still no curative treatment, researchers focus on finding novel methods to help the patients. One of the valid options is cellular therapy, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy yields great expectations. These cells possess especially valuable attributes regarding key points of SSc. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and safety of this therapy must undergo a rigorous process of verification. In preclinical trials, animal models proved to be a valuable source of scientific knowledge regarding SSc. Because of that, it has been possible to test autologous or allogeneic MSCs from various sources in many clinical trials. A lot of aspects still have to be determined to assess their potential in the management of SSc, probably in association with other therapies.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research