Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta

Lang E., Semon JA.

Narrative Review on Immune Modulation, published in Cell Regen (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Regen (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36725748
PMCID
PMC9892307
DOI
10.1186/s13619-022-00146-3
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a disease caused by mutations in different genes resulting in mild, severe, or lethal forms. With no cure, researchers have investigated the use of cell therapy to correct the underlying molecular defects of OI. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are of particular interest because of their differentiation capacity, immunomodulatory effects, and their ability to migrate to sites of damage. MSCs can be isolated from different sources, expanded in culture, and have been shown to be safe in numerous clinical applications. This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical studies of MSCs in the treatment of OI. Altogether, the culmination of these studies show that MSCs from different sources: 1) are safe to use in the clinic, 2) migrate to fracture sites and growth sites in bone, 3) engraft in low levels, 4) improve clinical outcome but have a transient effect, 5) have a therapeutic effect most likely due to paracrine mechanisms, and 6) have a reduced therapeutic potential when isolated from patients with OI.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research