Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Mesenchymal stromal cell and mononuclear cell therapy in heart disease.

Haack-Sorensen M., Friis T., Kastrup J.

Laboratory Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Future Cardiol (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Future Cardiol (2008)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
19804342
DOI
10.2217/14796678.4.5.481

Abstract (original English)

Despite progress in percutaneous coronary intervention, bypass surgery and drug therapy, rates of mortality and morbidity after acute coronary syndrome are high due to ventricular remodeling and heart failure. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from adult bone marrow or adipose tissue are considered potential candidates for therapeutic regenerative treatment in cardiovascular disease. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that MSCs can induce neovascularization and improve myocardial function in postinfarction myocardial ischemic hearts. This review will focus on the present preclinical and clinical knowledge about the use of mononuclear cells and MSCs for cardiac regenerative medicine, the source of MSCs for clinical use and problems to consider when conducting clinical MSC therapy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research