Methodologies in creating skin substitutes
Nicholas MN., Jeschke MG., Amini-Nik S.
Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Cell Mol Life Sci (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Cell Mol Life Sci (2016)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 27154041
- PMCID
- PMC4982839
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-016-2252-8
- Citations
- 62
Abstract (original English)
The creation of skin substitutes has significantly decreased morbidity and mortality of skin wounds. Although there are still a number of disadvantages of currently available skin substitutes, there has been a significant decline in research advances over the past several years in improving these skin substitutes. Clinically most skin substitutes used are acellular and do not use growth factors to assist wound healing, key areas of potential in this field of research. This article discusses the five necessary attributes of an ideal skin substitute. It comprehensively discusses the three major basic components of currently available skin substitutes: scaffold materials, growth factors, and cells, comparing and contrasting what has been used so far. It then examines a variety of techniques in how to incorporate these basic components together to act as a guide for further research in the field to create cellular skin substitutes with better clinical results.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Safety of Fat Graft Myringoplasty Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma for Managing Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 522 on Chronic Wound, published in Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 522
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Best evidence summary for platelet-rich plasma treatment of chronic wounds
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Regen Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Regen Ther - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Dedifferentiation of Mature Adipocytes and Their Future Potential for Regenerative Medicine Applications
Systematic Review on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, published in Biomedicines (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Biomedicines - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
PLoS One1 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol