Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Methodologies in creating skin substitutes

Nicholas MN., Jeschke MG., Amini-Nik S.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Cell Mol Life Sci (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Mol Life Sci (2016)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
27154041
PMCID
PMC4982839
DOI
10.1007/s00018-016-2252-8
Citations
62

Abstract (original English)

The creation of skin substitutes has significantly decreased morbidity and mortality of skin wounds. Although there are still a number of disadvantages of currently available skin substitutes, there has been a significant decline in research advances over the past several years in improving these skin substitutes. Clinically most skin substitutes used are acellular and do not use growth factors to assist wound healing, key areas of potential in this field of research. This article discusses the five necessary attributes of an ideal skin substitute. It comprehensively discusses the three major basic components of currently available skin substitutes: scaffold materials, growth factors, and cells, comparing and contrasting what has been used so far. It then examines a variety of techniques in how to incorporate these basic components together to act as a guide for further research in the field to create cellular skin substitutes with better clinical results.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
FibroblastsMesenchymal Stem CellsSkinHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsBiocompatible MaterialsSkin, ArtificialCell AdhesionTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research