Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Methods and Limitations of Augmenting Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Therapeutic Applications

Huerta CT., Ortiz YY., Liu ZJ., Velazquez OC.

Narrative Review on Immune Modulation, published in Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36301919
PMCID
PMC10254976
DOI
10.1089/wound.2022.0107
Citations
23

Abstract (original English)

Significance: Given their capacity for self-renewal, multilineage differentiation, and immunomodulatory potential, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent a promising modality of clinical therapy for both regenerative medicine and immune diseases. In this study, we review the key approaches and popular methods utilized to boost potency and modify functions of MSCs for clinical purposes as well as their associated limitations. Recent Advances: Several major domains of cell modification strategies are currently employed by investigators to overcome these deficits and augment the therapeutic potential of MSCs. Priming MSCs with soluble factors or pharmacologic agents as well as manipulating oxygen availability in culture have been demonstrated to be effective biochemical methods to augment MSC potential. Distinct genetic and epigenetic methods have emerged in recent years to modify the genetic expression of target proteins and factors thereby modulating MSCs capacity for differentiation, migration, and proliferation. Physical methods utilizing three-dimensional culture methods and alternative cell delivery systems and scaffolds can be used to recapitulate the native MSC niche and augment their engraftment and viability for in vivo models. Critical Issues: Unmodified MSCs have demonstrated only modest benefits in many preclinical and clinical studies due to issues with cell engraft

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineCell Differentiation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research