Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Microfluidic and Paper-Based Devices for Disease Detection and Diagnostic Research

Campbell JM., Balhoff JB., Landwehr GM., Rahman SM., Vaithiyanathan M., Melvin AT.

Narrative Review on Hip, published in Int J Mol Sci (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
30213089
PMCID
PMC6164778
DOI
10.3390/ijms19092731
Citations
39

Abstract (original English)

Recent developments in microfluidic devices, nanoparticle chemistry, fluorescent microscopy, and biochemical techniques such as genetic identification and antibody capture have provided easier and more sensitive platforms for detecting and diagnosing diseases as well as providing new fundamental insight into disease progression. These advancements have led to the development of new technology and assays capable of easy and early detection of pathogenicity as well as the enhancement of the drug discovery and development pipeline. While some studies have focused on treatment, many of these technologies have found initial success in laboratories as a precursor for clinical applications. This review highlights the current and future progress of microfluidic techniques geared toward the timely and inexpensive diagnosis of disease including technologies aimed at high-throughput single cell analysis for drug development. It also summarizes novel microfluidic approaches to characterize fundamental cellular behavior and heterogeneity.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansDimethylpolysiloxanesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesEquipment DesignMicrofluidicsPoint-of-Care SystemsLab-On-A-Chip DevicesSingle-Cell Analysis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research