Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Modifying cyclosporine associated renal allograft dysfunction.

Mohapatra N., Vanikar AV., Patel RD., Trivedi HL.

Prospective Study on Chronic Kidney Disease, published in Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl (2009) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl (2009)
Country
Saudi Arabia
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
19736471

Abstract (original English)

Transplantation is accepted therapy for chronic kidney disease. However the essential immunosuppressive agents for graft survival have their own side-effects. Renal biopsy is a reliable tool for diagnosing cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity. To present our observations on CsA toxicity in renal allograft biopsies, we studied prospectively 207 renal allograft biopsies performed for graft dysfunction as per Ahmedabad Tolerance Induction Protocol (ATIP) and compared them to 50 controls from January to October 2007. The ATIP comprised donor specific leucocyte infusions, low dose target specific irradiation; non-myeloablative condi-tioning with Anti-T +/- B cell antibodies followed by intraportal administration of cultured donor bone marrow (BM) +/- adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells. Renal transplantation was performed following negative lymphocytotoxicity cross-matching. The post-transplant immunosuppressive agents included CsA 2.5 +/- 0.5 mg/kg BW/day and prednisone 0.2 mg/kg BW/day. The controls were transplanted using standard triple immunosuppressive agents including CsA 5 +/- 1 mg/Kg BW/day, prednisone 0.6 mg/kg BW/day, and MMF/ Azathioprine. The Institutional Review Board approved the ATIP. The biopsies were categorized into 2 groups; group A (N=97): performed < 6 months, group B (N= 160), > 6 months posttransplant. Acute CsA toxicity was observed in group A: 2.5% A

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdolescentAdultAzathioprineBiopsyCase-Control StudiesChildCyclosporineDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGraft Rejection

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research