The Most Influential Publications Regarding Hair Transplantation: A Bibliometric Review
Lizardi JJ., Treger D., Braud SC., Boghosian T., Abd RE., Jabori SK.
Narrative Review on Hair Loss, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Aesthetic Plast Surg (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39271549
- PMCID
- PMC11739209
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00266-024-04049-3
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
Introduction This bibliometric review aims to assess the impact of significant publications within the field of hair transplantation. Citation counts will serve as a primary influence indicator. Methods An exhaustive search was conducted using Clarivate's Web of Science database, yielding 260 publications related to hair transplantation. These were evaluated and sorted based on citations, narrowing down to the 50 most highly cited works for analysis. Parameters including citation density, authorship, institutional affiliations, country of origin, year of publication, article topic, and the level of evidence for each publication were obtained. Results Analyzed publications were cited a total of 1341 times. Authorship analysis revealed that the most significant contributors regarding hair transplantation were Bernstein and Rassman. We also identified the leading institutions affiliated with these works, highlighting the primary academic and research centers driving the field. Geographical analysis exhibited the US' dominance in producing impactful publications. Most publications were also classified within Level IV and Level V according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence system. Conclusion This review provides a comprehensive snapshot of the pivotal publications shaping hair transplantation. Our findings underscore significant contributions within this field and may assist research
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The suitability of mesenchymal stem cells for treating immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 609 on Hair Loss, Immune Modulation, Autoimmune Research, published in Dermatol Reports (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 609
Dermatol Reports - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A systematic review of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of conditioned media, platelet-rich fibrin, stromal vascular fraction, extracellular vesicles, and stem cells in androgenetic alopecia.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 724 on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 724
Stem Cell Res Ther - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
DKK3-CKAP4 signaling drives fibroimmune remodeling and hair follicle miniaturization in androgenetic alopecia
Meta-analysis on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Theranostics (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Theranostics - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 24 on Chronic Wound, Burns, Hair Loss, published in J Int Med Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 24
J Int Med Res1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived exosomes in hair regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in World J Stem Cells (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
World J Stem Cells2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Exosomes and Hair Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence Across Alopecia Types and Exosome Sources.
Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol6 citations