Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Nanofibrous Platforms for Advanced Wound Therapeutics: Mechanisms, Materials, and Clinical Horizons

Cho W., Yang C., Yoo HS.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Macromol Biosci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Macromol Biosci (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42145223
PMCID
PMC13181720
DOI
10.1002/mabi.70189

Abstract (original English)

Nanofibrous dressings have emerged as a transformative solution for acute and chronic wound management. This review evaluates recent advancements in wound therapeutics utilizing nanofiber platforms incorporating various bioactive agents. A comprehensive overview of the wound healing process across distinct physiological phases is provided, alongside a discussion of nanofiber fabrication methodologies and their underlying mechanisms. Particular emphasis is placed on the constituent materials and their inherent biofunctionality, specifically regarding how cellular interactions with these substrates enhance wound healing outcomes. Furthermore, we examine the clinical utility of these scaffolds in achieving hemostasis, modulating inflammation, preventing infection, and promoting angiogenesis. The review concludes by highlighting the cost-effectiveness and tunable architecture of nanofibers, underscoring their potential as the next generation of efficacious wound care systems.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsBandagesWound HealingNanofibers

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research