Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

New opportunities: harnessing induced pluripotency for discovery in diabetes and metabolism

Teo AK., Wagers AJ., Kulkarni RN.

Narrative Review on Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, published in Cell Metab (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Metab (2013)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
24035588
PMCID
PMC3858409
DOI
10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.010
Citations
38

Abstract (original English)

The landmark discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Shinya Yamanaka has transformed regenerative biology. Previously, insights into the pathogenesis of chronic human diseases have been hindered by the inaccessibility of patient samples. However, scientists are now able to convert patient fibroblasts into iPSCs and differentiate them into disease-relevant cell types. This ability opens new avenues for investigating disease pathogenesis and designing novel treatments. In this review, we highlight the uses of human iPSCs to uncover the underlying causes and pathological consequences of diabetes and metabolic syndromes, multifactorial diseases whose etiologies have been difficult to unravel using traditional methodologies.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Insulin ResistanceCell DifferentiationGenome-Wide Association StudyInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMetabolic Syndrome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research