Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMC

Non-viral reprogramming and induced pluripotent stem cells for cardiovascular therapy

Panda A., Gurusamy N., Rajasingh S., Carter HK., Thomas EL., Rajasingh J.

Clinical Trial on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Differentiation (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Differentiation (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31954271
PMCID
PMC7138699
DOI
10.1016/j.diff.2019.12.001
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Despite significant effort devoted to developing new treatments and procedures, cardiac disease is still one of the leading causes of death in the world. The loss of myocytes due to ischemic injury remains a major therapeutic challenge. However, cell-based therapy to repair the injured heart has shown significant promise in basic and translation research and in clinical trials. Embryonic stem cells have been successfully used to improve cardiac outcomes. Unfortunately, treatment with these cells is complicated by ethical and legal issues. Recent progress in developing induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using non-viral vectors has made it possible to derive cardiomyocytes for therapy. This review will focus on these non-integration-based approaches for reprogramming and their therapeutic advantages for cardiovascular medicine.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Myocytes, CardiacHumansHeart DiseasesRegenerative MedicineCell DifferentiationGenetic VectorsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCellular Reprogramming

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research