Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Novel cardioprotective and regenerative therapies in acute myocardial infarction: a review of recent and ongoing clinical trials

Spath NB., Mills NL., Cruden NL.

Clinical Trial on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Future Cardiol (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Future Cardiol (2016)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
27791385
PMCID
PMC5985502
DOI
10.2217/fca-2016-0044
Citations
29

Abstract (original English)

Following the original large-scale randomized trials of aspirin and β-blockade, there have been a number of major advances in pharmacological and mechanical treatments for acute myocardial infarction. Despite this progress, myocardial infarction remains a major global cause of mortality and morbidity, driving a quest for novel treatments in this area. As the understanding of mitochondrial dynamics and the pathophysiology of reperfusion injury has evolved, the last three decades have seen advances in ischemic conditioning, pharmacological and metabolic cardioprotection, as well as biological and stem-cell therapies. The aim of this review is to provide a synopsis of adjunctive cardioprotective and regenerative therapies currently undergoing or entering early clinical trials in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansMyocardial InfarctionCardiotonic AgentsIschemic PreconditioningHypothermia, InducedStem Cell TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicIschemic Postconditioning

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research