Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Orthobiologic Augmentation to Improve Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes: Current and Future Strategies

Jabara J., Kiani S., Youn A., Feeley B.

Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Chronic Wound, published in J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40456132
PMCID
PMC12181046
DOI
10.5435/jaaos-d-25-00069
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Rotator cuff tear (RCT) management continues to represent a notable area of research given its widespread prevalence. Although current strategies of care focus on pain reduction and functional restoration, there has been an increasing amount of focus on the orthobiologics of RCTs in hopes of delivering more efficient, targeted therapies. Understanding these cellular mechanisms of rotator cuff injury outcomes is thus crucial in advancing biologic treatments; as such, this article first aims to summarize the orthobiologic mechanisms that underpin post-RCT tendon-bone healing and muscle degeneration. Next, we review the current strategies of biologic augmentation, including bone marrow stimulation, platelet-rich plasma, and mesenchymal stromal and stem cell therapy. Finally, we offer insights into the future of cell-based treatments, from harnessing extracellular vesicles to deliver biologic therapies to inducing promyogenic cellular differentiation at the site of injury.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Rotator CuffHumansTreatment OutcomeMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound HealingPlatelet-Rich PlasmaRotator Cuff Injuries

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research