Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Photobiomodulation associated to cellular therapy improve wound healing of experimental full thickness burn wounds in rats.

Lamaro-Cardoso A., Bachion MM., Morais JM., Fantinati MS., Milhomem AC., Almeida VL.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Photochem Photobiol B (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Photochem Photobiol B (2019)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30999165
DOI
10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.04.003
Citations
18

Abstract (original English)

Adipose derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a method of cell therapy potentially applicable for treatment of full thickness burns. Here we investigated if the association of photobiomodulation (PBM) with SVF therapy could improve wound healing in experimentally induced full thickness burn wounds in rats compared to the topical agent 2% silver sulfadiazine in a dose-dependent manner. Sixty-six male Wistar rats were divided in 4 groups containing 5 animals each which received the following treatments: 2% sulfadiazine (SD), SVF, SVF plus PBM at 30 mW (SVFL30), and SVF plus PBM at 100 mW (SVFL100). Two donor animals were used for each experimental series with 3, 7 and 30 days. Digital photography, microscopic analysis with Hematoxilin and Eosin (H&E), quantification of collagen type I by picrosirius red staining analysis and wound contraction evaluation were performed in order to quantify the results. At day 3 SVF alone or combined with PBM promoted increased early inflammatory response compared to SD. At day 7 SVFL30 and SVFL100 enhanced inflammatory cells infiltration, angiogenesis and fibroblast content compared to SVF and SD groups. At day 30 collagen concentration and wound contraction were higher in SVFL30 when compared to the other groups. In conclusion PBM promotes a synergistic outcome with SVF therapy with a dose dependent effect potentializing wound healing of exp

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBurnsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDisease Models, AnimalLow-Level Light TherapyMaleRatsRats, WistarWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research